Monday, October 28, 2013

FYI: Benefit Enhanacement Law and Twenty Five Year Detective Investigator Retirement Benefit (Tier 2)

The maximum benefit under the Twenty Five (25) Year Detective Investigator Plan is equal to the benefit based on 32 years of credited service (Section 444) plus the 2 years of added service provided by Section 911 for a total of 34 years.

The actual benefit limit is 55% times the member's final 12 months earnings + (1.7% * 9) times the member's final average salary (120% capped three year average salary).

In contrast there is no maximum benefit limit on the Twenty (20) Year Detective Investigator Plan (Tier 2) (see Section 157.4 below). This plan, however, is not eligible for the pension enhancement benefit (S.911).

Enhancement Statute

§ 911. Benefit enhancements.

a. 1. An eligible member other than a member of the New York city teachers' retirement system (i) with a date of membership in a retirement system prior to July twenty-seventh, nineteen hundred seventy-six and (ii) who was in active service on June first, two thousand and continued in active service until October first, two thousand, shall receive one-twelfth of a year of additional retirement credit for each year of retirement credit for service rendered as of the date of retirement, vesting, transfer or death, if applicable, up to a maximum of two years of retirement credit. Such additional credit shall be available for all purposes, including fulfilling the qualifying service requirements of Plans A and C, if applicable.

2. An eligible member who is a member of the New York city teachers' retirement system (i) with a date of membership prior to July twenty-seventh, nineteen hundred seventy-six and (ii) who was in active service on October first, two thousand and (A) continued in active service up to and including June thirtieth, two thousand one, shall receive one-twelfth of a year of additional retirement credit for each year of retirement credit for service rendered as of the date of retirement, vesting, transfer or death, if applicable, up to a maximum of one year of retirement credit or (B) continued in active service up to and including June thirtieth, two thousand two, shall receive one-twelfth of a year of additional retirement credit for each year of retirement credit for service rendered as of the date of retirement, vesting, transfer or death, if applicable, up to a maximum of two years of retirement credit. No eligible member shall receive more than two years of retirement credit pursuant to this section. Such additional credit shall be available for all purposes, including fulfilling the qualifying service requirements of Plan A or C, if applicable.

3. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, if the service retirement benefit of an eligible member is subject to a maximum retirement benefit, including any limitation imposed by section four hundred forty-four of this chapter, the additional benefit authorized by this subdivision shall be computed by multiplying the pensionable salary base times the number of years of service credit granted by this subdivision times the benefit fraction of the plan under which the employee retires.

Tier 2 Section 444 Benefit Limitation Statute

§ 444. Maximum retirement benefits.

a. Except as provided in subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-a of this article, subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-b of this article, subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-c of this article, subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-d of this article as added by chapter four hundred seventy-two of the laws of nineteen hundred ninety-five, subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-e of this article, subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-f of this article and subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-h of this article, the maximum retirement benefit computed without optional modification provided to a member of a retirement system who is subject to the provisions of this article, other than a police officer, a firefighter, an investigator member of the New York city employees' retirement system, a member of the uniformed personnel in institutions under the jurisdiction of the New York city department of correction who receives a performance of duty disability retirement allowance, a member of the uniformed personnel in institutions under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections and community supervision or a security hospital treatment assistant, as those terms are defined in subdivision i of section eighty-nine of this chapter, who receives a performance of duty disability retirement allowance, a member of a teachers' retirement system, New York city employees' retirement system, New York city board of education retirement system or a member of the New York state and local employees' retirement system or a member of the New York city employees' retirement system or New York city board of education retirement system employed as a special officer, parking control specialist, school safety agent, campus peace officer, taxi and limousine inspector or a police communications member and who receives a performance of duty disability pension, from funds other than those based on a member's own or increased-take-home-pay contributions, shall, before any reduction for early retirement, be sixty per centum of the first fifteen thousand three hundred dollars of final average salary, and fifty per centum of final average salary in excess of fifteen thousand three hundred dollars, and forty per centum of final average salary in excess of twenty-seven thousand three hundred dollars, provided, however, that the benefits provided by subdivision c of section four hundred forty-five-d of this article as added by chapter four hundred seventy-two of the laws of nineteen hundred ninety-five based upon the additional member contributions required by subdivision d of such section four hundred forty-five-d shall be subject to the maximum retirement benefit computations set forth in this section. The maximum retirement benefit computed without optional modification payable to a police officer, an investigator member of the New York city employees' retirement system or a firefighter shall equal that payable upon completion of thirty years of service, except that the maximum service retirement benefit computed without optional modification shall equal that payable upon completion of thirty-two years of service.

b. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision a of this section, a member employed as a uniformed court officer or peace officer in the unified court system granted accidental disability retirement benefits shall receive a pension of three-quarters of final average salary. The payment of such pension shall be subject to the provisions of section sixty-four of this chapter.

c. Notwithstanding section three hundred sixty-three-c of this chapter, accidentally disabled police officers and firefighters shall receive a pension of three-quarters of their final average salary. The payment of such pension shall be subject to the provisions of section three hundred sixty-four of this chapter.

d. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision a of this section, the retirement benefit payable to a member of the New York city police pension fund or the New York city fire department pension fund who has completed thirty or more years of service at the time of his or her retirement shall be based on the total service with which such member has been credited at retirement.

Tier 2 Twenty (20) Year Detective Investigator Plan - benefit description

Section 157.4 (NYC Admin Code)

2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the early service retirement benefit for participants in the twenty year retirement program who retire pursuant to paragraph one of this subdivision shall be a retirement allowance consisting of:
(i) an amount, on account of the required minimum period of service, equal to fifty percent of the salary earned in the year prior to his or her retirement; plus
(ii) an amount for each additional year of credited service as an investigator member, or fraction thereof, beyond such required minimum period of service equal to one-sixtieth of the average annual earnings from his or her date of eligibility for retirement to the actual date of retirement; plus
(iii) an amount for each year, or fraction thereof, of service credit not included in subparagraph (i) or (ii) of this paragraph equal to fifty-five percent of one-sixtieth of his or her final compensation if such service credit was for service rendered prior to October first, nineteen hundred fifty-one, or seventy-five percent of one-sixtieth of his or her final compensation if such service was rendered subsequent to October first, nineteen hundred fifty-one.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Stop the Bleeding - Public Pension Funds Under Attack - Report and NY Times article

I have been hammering the NYCERS trustees for several years about about their investment decisions, in particular, allocations to private equity, real estate partnerships, and hedge funds.

Now there is a growing record of how misplaced these investments are for public pension funds.

Read the October 20, 2013 NY Times article by Gretchen Morgenson, Ted Seidle's recap article in Forbes on the investigation to the assault on the Employee Retirement System of Rhode Island, and the broad sweeping expose in Rolling Stone magazine.

Here is the link to the full investigative report.

Maybe the new mayor could find the money for his pre-K program by stopping the bleeding of the pension funds by Wall Street.

Friday, October 18, 2013

DOI and Mazza

The Department of Investigation (DOI) recently released a fraud report involving theft of NYCERS checks.

Below is an excerpt from the beginning of the report which was 23 pages long and dealt with the loss of nearly $384,000 from NYCERS. The report, while accurate about the fraudulant cashing of NYCERS benefit checks, is a lot to do about a relatively small issue. DOI rarelly reports a complete accounting of the actual convictions and prison sentences that result from its investigations.

I want, however, to point out specifically the mention of Commissioner Gill Hearn's thanks to Karen Mazza at the end of the excerpt. Of course, Gill Hearn doesn't mention that she has not completed the investigation that DOI had committed to pursue into perjury and corruption charges against Mazza and other NYCERS management staff. I am sure the financial impact of corrupt management at NYCERS is far greater than $384,000.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: DIANE STRUZZI
WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2012
(212) 825-5931
DOI RELEASES PENSION FRAUD REPORT INVOLVING EIGHT SEPARATE CASES IN WHICH INDIVIDUALS ATTEMPTED TO DEFRAUD OR DEFRAUDED NYCERS OF MORE THAN $400,000
ROSE GILL HEARN, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), released a report today detailing eight recent investigations into fraud upon the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (“NYCERS“), the country’s largest municipal pension system. The eight investigations included in this report are the most recent that DOI has conducted and illustrate a range of fraudulent schemes that include family members and beneficiaries of deceased pensioners taking NYCERS funds they were not entitled to receive and the theft of NYCERS checks by ndividuals who falsely claimed they had not received the funds. These eight investigations identified nearly $384,000 in NYCERS funds that individuals wrongfully obtained and an attempt to obtain approximately $17,200, which was thwarted by DOI and NYCERS. Five of the eight individuals have already been criminally charged and three of those individuals have pleaded guilty, with one individual receiving a 60-day jail sentence just last week. A copy of the report is attached to this release.
...
Commissioner Gill Hearn thanked NYCERS Executive Director Diane D’Alessandro, NYCERS Director of Security Craig Thornton, and NYCERS General Counsel Karen Mazza, and their staffs, for their assistance and cooperation in these investigations.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

State Insurance Audit Checklist

Since July 29. 2013 the State Insurance Department (NYS DFS) has accessed my blog 29 times. So I thought I would provide them with a suggested reading list. Below is a starting list. If I see something else that looks interesting, I'll add to the list.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

NY Times - Sorkin - Pension Investment Consultants - Transparency - Where the Money Comes From

In an October 1, 2013 NY Times article Andrew Ross Sorkin writes about the investment consultants that are hired by U.S. pensions funds. His focus is the lack of transparency with respect to the performance of these consultants.

While anyone hiring an investment consultant should want to know the quality of the advice that the consultant has given in the past, what is even more important is how does the consultant makes his/her money.

With respect to pension funds, investment consultants primarily provide advice on asset allocation and help in the selection, monitoring, and termination of investment managers. Unfortunately these consultants earn revenues not only from pension funds but also from investment managers that the consultants are hired to monitor.

Years ago I told my young son the story of the emperor's new clothes. It made no sense to him that people at court would not have told the emperor about the scam. Why did it fall to the child to point out the obvious?

The entire pension fund industry knows that the investment consultant structure is broken but as in the story there is shortage of courage among the adults. It is obvious that the pension funds should insist that investment consultants earn only revenue from pension funds and never anything from the investment managers that they are required to critique. Of course, pension funds would have to pay the investment consultants a lot more money. It would, however, be money well spent.

As further background on this structural flaw refer to this old posting I wrote in 2010. If anything, the situation has gotten worse since then.